?

Log in

No account? Create an account
OpenBSD: it's not ice-cream. - The tissue of the Tears of Zorro [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
tearsofzorro

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

OpenBSD: it's not ice-cream. [Mar. 31st, 2006|06:40 pm]
tearsofzorro
[Tags|, , ]
[mood |annoyedannoyed]


Fucking Open BSD! GOD DAMMIT! DAG NAB FUCKIN' WASTE OF BASTARDIN' SPACE!

*calms*

Ports deserves to die. You know why? Because the documentation for a file says "we have a chroot flavour", which happens to be exactly what I want. However, one would think that such assurances from ports would mean that such a flavour would exist. It didn't. As a result, I want to beat Theo de Raadt over the head with his fucking ports system, and then sodomise him with the red hot poker of Justice!

"OpenBSD - security: at the expense of your sanity!"
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: nimrangul
2006-04-02 06:48 pm (UTC)

Well...

Theo's not really involved. That would be the fault of that port's maintainer, which programme was it you were trying to deal with?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: tearsofzorro
2006-04-02 09:09 pm (UTC)

Re: Well...

Aye, my apologies. It was mainly me letting off steam about inheriting the responsibility of maintaining a bad setup (which happens to be breaking right now) from some openbsd zealots (mainly it's the zealotry I'm against, not the openbsd bit).

Anyway the port is mini_sendmail and the flavour is chroot... which apparently doesn't exist any more. I've since gotten the appropriate package and installed it... although I'm

The other fun one is trying to get a nice little setup so we can use things like netpbm or imagemagick in the chroot - preferably statically compiled, but that's for when I'm not due to sit exams etc.

Anyway, nice for ya to pop in! :)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)