Log in

No account? Create an account
I could not give a FLYING SQUIRREL FECES about Unkie Farking Wuss… - The tissue of the Tears of Zorro [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[Oct. 29th, 2006|04:19 pm]
[Tags|, ]

I could not give a FLYING SQUIRREL FECES about Unkie Farking Wuss right now!

Right now, there is just SO much saturation that I couldn't give a toss. This isn't about whether or not he is in the right or the wrong, or what Patient {a..e} said. Really, I have my opinions, and I'm keeping quiet on those because they're unpopular. BUT, I am looking on certain mailing lists and I'm just seeing the same people butting the same heads and I'm just sick of it.

Every time I open my mailbox I see the same rehashed article. I see the same people saying "This is bullshit", and I see a few people say "well I think he made some mistakes and needs a look at" and they will be shouted down with the same typical dogma.

It generally goes along the lines of (I shall be using pointers for this):
A* : [article]
A* : Isn't this horrible?
B* : I agree.
C* : I actually don't. If he'd done his homework, and looked at the history behind Patient E, he'd have blatantly seen that there were some big problems.
A* and B*: Well... yeah! So's yer face! It's all self-determined anyway.

And every single day my mailbox fills up with this crap! Every single bloody day. And I can't ignore it, and I have to read it because I'm a moderator. I have to make sure nothing gets inflamatory, and I have to facilitate free speech, even if I don't like what some people are saying or how they're getting damned near dogmatic as they say it.

Actually, that's pretty much my problem. It's not what they're saying, even though I have an opinion. It's how they're going about saying it. I just don't like the form. Of course, it does its job. People see it, and the smarter people realise there's no use replying more than once, and then back down.


[User Picture]From: granite_lullaby
2006-10-30 12:13 am (UTC)
My one tangential input: I never noticed how trans and rants are anagrams of one another.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: dogwithoutlegs
2006-10-30 12:08 pm (UTC)
What you be talking about. is this on aP?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: tearsofzorro
2006-10-30 01:57 pm (UTC)
God no. It's a trans mailing list I'm on. Not the spud.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)